You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Butyrate Protects Mice from Clostridium difficile-Induced Colitis through an HIF-1-Dependent Mechanism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José Luís Fachi, Jaqueline de Souza Felipe, Laís Passariello Pral, Bruna Karadi da Silva, Renan Oliveira Corrêa, Mirella Cristiny Pereira de Andrade, Denise Morais da Fonseca, Paulo José Basso, Niels Olsen Saraiva Câmara, Éricka Lorenna de Sales e Souza, Flaviano dos Santos Martins, Suzana Eiko Sato Guima, Andrew Maltez Thomas, João Carlos Setubal, Yuli Thamires Magalhães, Fábio Luis Forti, Thamiris Candreva, Hosana Gomes Rodrigues, Marcelo Bispo de Jesus, Sílvio Roberto Consonni, Alessandro dos Santos Farias, Patrick Varga-Weisz, Marco Aurélio Ramirez Vinolo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 62% |
| Scientists | 10 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 286 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 91 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 52 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 105 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,400,232
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#3,194
of 13,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,665
of 365,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#100
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.