You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Parallel Processing of Sound Dynamics across Mouse Auditory Cortex via Spatially Patterned Thalamic Inputs and Distinct Areal Intracortical Circuits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.069 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji Liu, Matthew R. Whiteway, Alireza Sheikhattar, Daniel A. Butts, Behtash Babadi, Patrick O. Kanold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Mexico | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 51 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,789,745
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#10,982
of 12,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,070
of 364,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#315
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.