| Title |
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James W. Garrard, Natalie J. Cox, Richard M. Dodds, Helen C. Roberts, Avan A. Sayer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 251 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
| Researcher | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 18% |
| Unknown | 90 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 26 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 92 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,115,314
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#221
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,977
of 366,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.