You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002778 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Wastlund, Alexandros A. Moraitis, Alison Dacey, Ulla Sovio, Edward C. F. Wilson, Gordon C. S. Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 66 | 61% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 17% |
| Scientists | 16 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 20% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 884. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#19,820
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#72
of 5,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378
of 347,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#2
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.