↓ Skip to main content

The Doctrine of Double Effect and Killing Animals for Food

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
The Doctrine of Double Effect and Killing Animals for Food
Published in
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10806-019-09771-6
Authors

Lukas Tank, Stefanie Thiele

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Philosophy 1 8%
Linguistics 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,202,531
of 24,132,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#297
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,672
of 357,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,132,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.