↓ Skip to main content

Thank you for your lovely card: ethical considerations in responding to bereaved parents invited in error to participate in childhood cancer survivorship research

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Thank you for your lovely card: ethical considerations in responding to bereaved parents invited in error to participate in childhood cancer survivorship research
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11019-014-9587-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire E. Wakefield, Jordana K. McLoone, Leigh A. Donovan, Richard J. Cohn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 39%
Social Sciences 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,361,255
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#379
of 593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,470
of 229,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.