↓ Skip to main content

Long-term health-related quality of life in eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Long-term health-related quality of life in eating disorders
Published in
Quality of Life Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11136-016-1250-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veera Pohjolainen, Salla Koponen, Pirjo Räsänen, Risto P. Roine, Harri Sintonen, Hasse Karlsson

Abstract

There is limited evidence on the long-term development of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in eating disorders and its relation to eating disorder symptoms. Our objective was to measure long-term change in the HRQoL of eating disorder patients and compare it to normal population. Fifty-four bulimia nervosa (BN) and forty-seven anorexia nervosa (AN) patients (ICD-10 diagnosis) entering treatment completed the 15D HRQoL questionnaire and the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) before and approximately 8 years after the start of treatment. Baseline HRQoL was severely impaired in the patients. During follow-up, mean HRQoL, body mass index (BMI) and EDI improved statistically significantly in both groups. BMI of AN patients reached normal values, but HRQoL was still severely impaired in both AN and BN compared to general population. The long-term HRQoL after treatment continues to improve, but is still after 8 years poor. Eating disorders are very serious conditions with long-lasting impact on quality of life even after symptom remission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 26%
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2016.
All research outputs
#13,383,803
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,299
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,516
of 297,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#22
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.