You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimal dilation time for combined small endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation for common bile duct stones: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30075-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenbo Meng, Joseph W Leung, Kai Zhang, Wence Zhou, Zhenyu Wang, Leida Zhang, Hao Sun, Ping Xue, Wei Liu, Qi Wang, Jijun Zhang, Xuefeng Wang, Meng Wang, Yingmei Shao, Kailin Cai, Senlin Hou, Qiyong Li, Lei Zhang, Kexiang Zhu, Ping Yue, Haiping Wang, Ming Zhang, Xiangyu Sun, Zhiqing Yang, Jie Tao, Zilong Wen, Qunwei Wang, Bendong Chen, Quan Shao, Mingning Zhao, Ruoyan Zhang, Tiemin Jiang, Ke Liu, Lichao Zhang, Kangjie Chen, Xiaoliang Zhu, Hui Zhang, Long Miao, Zhengfeng Wang, Jiajia Li, Xiaowen Yan, Fangzhao Wang, Lingen Zhang, Azumi Suzuki, Kiyohito Tanaka, Ula Nur, Elisabete Weiderpass, Xun Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,029,857
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#1,022
of 1,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,714
of 347,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.