↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Ongoing Feedback During a 12-Month Maintenance Walking Program on Daily Physical Activity in People with COPD

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Ongoing Feedback During a 12-Month Maintenance Walking Program on Daily Physical Activity in People with COPD
Published in
Lung, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00408-019-00216-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally L. Wootton, Kylie Hill, Jennifer A. Alison, Li Whye Cindy Ng, Sue Jenkins, Peter R. Eastwood, David R. Hillman, Christine Jenkins, Lissa M. Spencer, Nola Cecins, Zoe J. McKeough

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 34 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 41 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,110,575
of 25,328,635 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#75
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,836
of 358,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,328,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.