↓ Skip to main content

How Do Power and Status Differ in Predicting Unethical Decisions? A Cross-National Comparison of China and Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
How Do Power and Status Differ in Predicting Unethical Decisions? A Cross-National Comparison of China and Canada
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04150-7
Authors

Yongmei Liu, Sixuan Chen, Chris Bell, Justin Tan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 20 31%
Psychology 9 14%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,569,433
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,100
of 2,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,456
of 350,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#42
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.