| Title |
Lasiodiplodia theobromae Keratitis: A Case Report and Review of Literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mycopathologia, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11046-012-9546-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suman Saha, Jayangshu Sengupta, Debdulal Banerjee, Archana Khetan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,843,356
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Mycopathologia
#148
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,822
of 164,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycopathologia
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them