↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of acoustical activity of bats prior to and 10 years after WNS on Fort Drum Army Installation, New York

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns of acoustical activity of bats prior to and 10 years after WNS on Fort Drum Army Installation, New York
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00633
Authors

Tomás Nocera, W. Mark Ford, Alexander Silvis, Christopher A. Dobony

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 33%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 37%
Environmental Science 15 28%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,569,433
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#1,057
of 1,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,376
of 351,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.