↓ Skip to main content

Heart failure in cardiomyopathies: a position paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Heart Failure, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
188 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
461 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heart failure in cardiomyopathies: a position paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
Published in
European Journal of Heart Failure, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/ejhf.1461
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petar M. Seferović, Marija Polovina, Johann Bauersachs, Michael Arad, Tuvia Ben Gal, Lars H. Lund, Stephan B. Felix, Eloisa Arbustini, Alida L.P. Caforio, Dimitrios Farmakis, Gerasimos S. Filippatos, Elias Gialafos, Vladimir Kanjuh, Gordana Krljanac, Giuseppe Limongelli, Aleš Linhart, Alexander R. Lyon, Ružica Maksimović, Davor Miličić, Ivan Milinković, Michel Noutsias, Ali Oto, Öztekin Oto, Siniša U. Pavlović, Massimo F. Piepoli, Arsen D. Ristić, Giuseppe M.C. Rosano, Hubert Seggewiss, Milika Ašanin, Jelena P. Seferović, Frank Ruschitzka, Jelena Čelutkiene, Tiny Jaarsma, Christian Mueller, Brenda Moura, Loreena Hill, Maurizio Volterrani, Yuri Lopatin, Marco Metra, Johannes Backs, Wilfried Mullens, Ovidiu Chioncel, Rudolf A. de Boer, Stefan Anker, Claudio Rapezzi, Andrew J.S. Coats, Carsten Tschöpe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 188 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 461 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Other 41 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 9%
Student > Master 31 7%
Other 93 20%
Unknown 170 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 8%
Unspecified 14 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 42 9%
Unknown 180 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#399,944
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#71
of 2,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,474
of 348,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.