You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meta‐analysis of patient‐reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Surgery, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bjs.11139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. J. Patterson, J. Beck, P. J. Currie, R. A. J. Spence, G. Spence |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 28% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 48% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,639,712
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#1,214
of 5,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,844
of 356,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#26
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.