↓ Skip to main content

Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Specialist breast cancer nurses’ views on implementing a fear of cancer recurrence intervention in practice: a mixed methods study
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00520-019-04762-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Cruickshank, Emma Steel, Deborah Fenlon, Jo Armes, Elspeth Banks, Gerald Humphris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 40 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Unspecified 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 40 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,364,566
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#393
of 5,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,864
of 357,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#16
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.