↓ Skip to main content

Examination and Validation of Classification Schema for Determining Thermal Taste Status

Overview of attention for article published in Chemosensory Perception, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Examination and Validation of Classification Schema for Determining Thermal Taste Status
Published in
Chemosensory Perception, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12078-019-09264-w
Authors

Margaret Thibodeau, Anthony Saliba, Martha Bajec, Gary Pickering

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,398,746
of 24,770,025 outputs
Outputs from Chemosensory Perception
#81
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,008
of 324,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemosensory Perception
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,770,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.