| Title |
Use of the confusion assessment method in multicentre delirium trials: training and standardisation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-019-1129-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John R. Green, Jane Smith, Elizabeth Teale, Michelle Collinson, Michael S. Avidan, Eva M. Schmitt, Sharon K. Inouye, John Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,222,771
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#859
of 3,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,736
of 368,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#26
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.