↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Cough and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic Cough and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Published in
CHEST, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne B. Chang, John J. Oppenheimer, Peter J. Kahrilas, Ahmad Kantar, Bruce K. Rubin, Miles Weinberger, Richard S. Irwin, CHEST Expert Cough Panel, Todd M. Adams, Kenneth W. Altman, Elie Azoulay, Alan F. Barker, Donald C. Bolser, Surinder S. Birring, Sidney S. Braman, Christopher Brightling, Priscilla Callahan-Lyon, Anne B. Chang, Terrie Cowley, Paul Davenport, Ali A. El Solh, Patricio Escalante, Stephen K. Field, Dina Fisher, Cynthia T. French, Cameron Grant, Peter Gibson, Susan M. Harding, Philip Gold, Anthony Harnden, Adam T. Hill, Richard S. Irwin, Peter J. Kahrilas, Joanne Kavanagh, Kefang Lai, Kaiser Lim, J. Mark Madison, Mark A. Malesker, Stuart Mazzone, Lorcan McGarvey, Joshua P. Metlay, Alex Molasoitis, M. Hassan Murad, Mangala Narasimhan, Peter Newcombe, John Oppenheimer, Mark Rosen, Bruce Rubin, Richard J. Russell, Jay H. Ryu, Sonal Singh, Jaclyn Smith, Maeve P. Smith, Susan M. Tarlo, Julie Turmel, Anne E. Vertigan, Miles Weinberger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 34 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 47%
Unspecified 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 35 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,796,228
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#3,717
of 13,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,790
of 347,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#48
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.