| Title |
Sedation practices and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in a prospective multicenter cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2394-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romina E. Aragón, Alvaro Proaño, Nicole Mongilardi, Aldo de Ferrari, Phabiola Herrera, Rollin Roldan, Enrique Paz, Amador A. Jaymez, Eduardo Chirinos, Jose Portugal, Rocio Quispe, Roy G. Brower, William Checkley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 13% |
| Spain | 9 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 7% |
| Japan | 8 | 6% |
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| Mexico | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 3% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 95 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 15% |
| Scientists | 16 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 25% |
| Unknown | 46 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 52 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#541,027
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#344
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,925
of 364,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.