↓ Skip to main content

Pastoralists' indigenous selection criteria and other breeding practices of the long-horned Ankole cattle in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Animal Health and Production, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Pastoralists' indigenous selection criteria and other breeding practices of the long-horned Ankole cattle in Uganda
Published in
Tropical Animal Health and Production, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11250-011-9935-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald Rugira Kugonza, Margaret Nabasirye, Olivier Hanotte, Denis Mpairwe, A. Mwai Okeyo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,686,573
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#168
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,889
of 121,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.