| Title |
Primary Care Physicians’ Perceived Barriers to Nephrology Referral and Co-management of Patients with CKD: a Qualitative Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-04975-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raquel C. Greer, Yang Liu, Kerri Cavanaugh, Clarissa Jonas Diamantidis, Michelle M. Estrella, C. John Sperati, Sandeep Soman, Khaled Abdel-Kader, Varun Agrawal, Laura C. Plantinga, Jane O. Schell, James F. Simon, Joseph A. Vassalotti, Bernard G. Jaar, Michael J. Choi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#487,949
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#385
of 8,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,056
of 325,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#10
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.