↓ Skip to main content

Intact leaf gas exchange provides a robust method for measuring the kinetics of stomatal conductance responses to abscisic acid and other small molecules in Arabidopsis and grasses

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Intact leaf gas exchange provides a robust method for measuring the kinetics of stomatal conductance responses to abscisic acid and other small molecules in Arabidopsis and grasses
Published in
Plant Methods, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13007-019-0423-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo H. O. Ceciliato, Jingbo Zhang, Qing Liu, Xin Shen, Honghong Hu, Chen Liu, Anton R. Schäffner, Julian I. Schroeder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Design 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,535,395
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#404
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,202
of 351,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.