↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of Valuations of Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Fee Schedule

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
57 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of Valuations of Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Fee Schedule
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2019
DOI 10.1056/nejmsa1807379
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C Chan, Johnny Huynh, David M Studdert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 25%
Student > Postgraduate 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 259. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#139,202
of 25,214,112 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#3,130
of 32,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,800
of 357,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#69
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,214,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.