| Title |
Float, explode or sink: postmortem fate of lung-breathing marine vertebrates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12549-011-0067-z |
| Authors |
Achim G. Reisdorf, Roman Bux, Daniel Wyler, Mark Benecke, Christian Klug, Michael W. Maisch, Peter Fornaro, Andreas Wetzel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 38% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Scientists | 10 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 112 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,289,993
of 24,970,913 outputs
Outputs from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#16
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,704
of 258,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.