You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Circulating growth/differentiation factor 15 is associated with human CD56bright natural killer cell dysfunction and nosocomial infection in severe systemic inflammation
|
---|---|
Published in |
EBioMedicine, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.018 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Holger Kleinertz, Monika Hepner-Schefczyk, Sabrina Ehnert, Maren Claus, Rebecca Halbgebauer, Lea Boller, Markus Huber-Lang, Paolo Cinelli, Carsten Kirschning, Sascha Flohé, André Sander, Christian Waydhas, Sonja Vonderhagen, Marcus Jäger, Marcel Dudda, Carsten Watzl, Stefanie B. Flohé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 26% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 19% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,040,416
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from EBioMedicine
#854
of 4,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,957
of 366,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EBioMedicine
#29
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.