↓ Skip to main content

Comparing birth experience and birth outcome of vaginal births between induced and spontaneous onset of labour: a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing birth experience and birth outcome of vaginal births between induced and spontaneous onset of labour: a prospective study
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00404-019-05150-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nora K. Schaal, Tanja Fehm, Josefine Albert, Martin Heil, Anya Pedersen, Markus Fleisch, Philip Hepp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 25 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 28 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1,667
of 2,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,251
of 369,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.