↓ Skip to main content

Gingerol inhibits cisplatin-induced vomiting by down regulating 5-hydroxytryptamine, dopamine and substance P expression in minks

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Pharmacal Research, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Gingerol inhibits cisplatin-induced vomiting by down regulating 5-hydroxytryptamine, dopamine and substance P expression in minks
Published in
Archives of Pharmacal Research, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12272-009-1413-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiu-hai Qian, Wang Yue, Yao-xia Wang, Zhi-hong Yang, Zhan-tao Liu, Wen-hui Chen

Abstract

To investigate the antiemetic effect of gingerol and its multi-targets effective mechanism on 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), dopamine (DA) and substance P (SP). The antiemetic effect of gingerol was investigated on a vomiting model of mink induced by cisplatin (7.5 mg . kg(-1), i.p.) in 6 h observation. The levels of 5-HT, DA and distribution of substance P in the area postrema and ileum were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and immunohistochemistry respectively. The frequency of cisplatin induced retching and vomiting was significantly reduced by pretreatment with gingerol in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.05). Cisplatin produced a significant increase in 5-HT and DA levels in the area postrema and ileum of minks (P<0.05), and this increase was significantly inhibited by gingerol in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.05). Substance P-immunoreactive was mainly situated in the mucosa and submucosa of ileum as well as in the neurons of area postrema, and gingerol markedly suppressed the increase immunoreactivity of substance P induced by cisplatin in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.05). Gingerol has good activity against cisplatin-induced emesis in minks possibly by inhibiting central or peripheral increase of 5-HT, DA and substance P.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Other 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2012.
All research outputs
#12,852,960
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#922
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,078
of 92,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#23
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.