You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zika viruses of African and Asian lineages cause fetal harm in a mouse model of vertical transmission
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007343 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna S. Jaeger, Reyes A. Murrieta, Lea R. Goren, Chelsea M. Crooks, Ryan V. Moriarty, Andrea M. Weiler, Sierra Rybarczyk, Matthew R. Semler, Christopher Huffman, Andres Mejia, Heather A. Simmons, Michael Fritsch, Jorge E. Osorio, Jens C. Eickhoff, Shelby L. O’Connor, Gregory D. Ebel, Thomas C. Friedrich, Matthew T. Aliota |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,691,691
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#1,072
of 9,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,044
of 364,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#19
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.