↓ Skip to main content

Oesophageal atresia

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oesophageal atresia
Published in
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41572-019-0077-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marinde van Lennep, Maartje M. J. Singendonk, Luigi Dall’Oglio, Fréderic Gottrand, Usha Krishnan, Suzanne W. J. Terheggen-Lagro, Taher I. Omari, Marc A. Benninga, Michiel P. van Wijk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 64 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 44%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 73 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,262,209
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#693
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,788
of 364,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.