↓ Skip to main content

SIRT6 Is Responsible for More Efficient DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Long-Lived Species

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SIRT6 Is Responsible for More Efficient DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Long-Lived Species
Published in
Cell, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao Tian, Denis Firsanov, Zhihui Zhang, Yang Cheng, Lingfeng Luo, Gregory Tombline, Ruiyue Tan, Matthew Simon, Steven Henderson, Janine Steffan, Audrey Goldfarb, Jonathan Tam, Kitty Zheng, Adam Cornwell, Adam Johnson, Jiang-Nan Yang, Zhiyong Mao, Bruno Manta, Weiwei Dang, Zhengdong Zhang, Jan Vijg, Aaron Wolfe, Kelsey Moody, Brian K. Kennedy, Dirk Bohmann, Vadim N. Gladyshev, Andrei Seluanov, Vera Gorbunova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 359 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 66 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Student > Master 35 10%
Professor 15 4%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 91 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 144 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 3%
Neuroscience 10 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 107 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#167,073
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#933
of 17,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,474
of 364,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#26
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.