↓ Skip to main content

Enquiring into the qualitative nature of anger: Challenges and strengths of the introspective method

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Enquiring into the qualitative nature of anger: Challenges and strengths of the introspective method
Published in
Current Psychology, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12144-019-00221-0
Authors

Benedikt Hackert, Anna-Lena Lumma, Paula Menzel, Terje Sparby, Ulrich Weger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 25%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,569,433
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychology
#1,013
of 1,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,868
of 352,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychology
#30
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.