You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects, equity, and cost of school-based and community-wide treatment strategies for soil-transmitted helminths in Kenya: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32591-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel L Pullan, Katherine E Halliday, William E Oswald, Carlos Mcharo, Emma Beaumont, Stella Kepha, Stefan Witek-McManus, Paul M Gichuki, Elizabeth Allen, Tom Drake, Catherine Pitt, Sultani H Matendechero, Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore, Roy M Anderson, Sammy M Njenga, Simon J Brooker, Charles S Mwandawiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
| Scientists | 8 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 77 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 84 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,149,477
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#13,073
of 42,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,774
of 363,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#221
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.