You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fluorescent nucleic acid probe in droplets for bacterial sorting (FNAP-sort) as a high-throughput screening method for environmental bacteria with various growth rates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0214533 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuri Ota, Kanako Saito, Taeko Takagi, Satoko Matsukura, Masamune Morita, Satoshi Tsuneda, Naohiro Noda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,389,965
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,018
of 219,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,068
of 357,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#691
of 2,849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.