You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors Associated With Use of Sipuleucel-T to Treat Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2589 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan E. V. Caram, Ryan Ross, Paul Lin, Bhramar Mukherjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 78% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 25% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,645,625
of 23,325,355 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#4,806
of 7,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,804
of 350,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#152
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,325,355 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 126.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.