You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of Peritumoral Radiomics With Tumor Biology and Pathologic Response to Preoperative Targeted Therapy for HER2 (ERBB2)–Positive Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2561 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathaniel Braman, Prateek Prasanna, Jon Whitney, Salendra Singh, Niha Beig, Maryam Etesami, David D. B. Bates, Katherine Gallagher, B. Nicolas Bloch, Manasa Vulchi, Paulette Turk, Kaustav Bera, Jame Abraham, William M. Sikov, George Somlo, Lyndsay N. Harris, Hannah Gilmore, Donna Plecha, Vinay Varadan, Anant Madabhushi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 65% |
| India | 3 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 51% |
| Scientists | 15 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 30% |
| Engineering | 12 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#632,436
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#3,212
of 9,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,006
of 358,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#87
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.