You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medical prescribing and antibiotic resistance: A game-theoretic analysis of a potentially catastrophic social dilemma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0215480 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew M. Colman, Eva M. Krockow, Edmund Chattoe-Brown, Carolyn Tarrant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| Spain | 4 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 8 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#464,223
of 25,173,778 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,498
of 218,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,308
of 357,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#110
of 2,843 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,173,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,843 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.