You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
MAPK pathway and B cells overactivation in multiple sclerosis revealed by phosphoproteomics and genomic analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1818347116 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ekaterina Kotelnikova, Narsis A. Kiani, Dimitris Messinis, Inna Pertsovskaya, Vicky Pliaka, Marti Bernardo-Faura, Melanie Rinas, Gemma Vila, Irati Zubizarreta, Irene Pulido-Valdeolivas, Theodore Sakellaropoulos, Wolfgang Faigle, Gilad Silberberg, Mar Masso, Pernilla Stridh, Janina Behrens, Tomas Olsson, Roland Martin, Friedemann Paul, Leonidas G. Alexopoulos, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Jesper Tegner, Pablo Villoslada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 15% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Hungary | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Sweden | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 10% |
Engineering | 6 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,026,307
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#45,732
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,820
of 356,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#651
of 989 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 989 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.