↓ Skip to main content

E6 proteins from high-risk HPV, low-risk HPV, and animal papillomaviruses activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway through E6AP-dependent degradation of NHERF1

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Pathogens, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
E6 proteins from high-risk HPV, low-risk HPV, and animal papillomaviruses activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway through E6AP-dependent degradation of NHERF1
Published in
PLoS Pathogens, April 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille M. Drews, Samuel Case, Scott B. Vande Pol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Student > Master 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,329,992
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#6,037
of 9,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,815
of 365,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#96
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.