You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of Diabetes With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2696 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jae Jeong Yang, Danxia Yu, Wanqing Wen, Eiko Saito, Shafiur Rahman, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yu Chen, Prakash C. Gupta, Dongfeng Gu, Shoichiro Tsugane, Yong-Bing Xiang, Yu-Tang Gao, Jian-Min Yuan, Akiko Tamakoshi, Fujiko Irie, Atsuko Sadakane, Yasutake Tomata, Seiki Kanemura, Ichiro Tsuji, Keitaro Matsuo, Chisato Nagata, Chien-Jen Chen, Woon-Puay Koh, Myung-Hee Shin, Sue K. Park, Pei-Ei Wu, You-Lin Qiao, Mangesh S. Pednekar, Jiang He, Norie Sawada, Hong-Lan Li, Jing Gao, Hui Cai, Renwei Wang, Toshimi Sairenchi, Eric Grant, Yumi Sugawara, Shu Zhang, Hidemi Ito, Keiko Wada, Chen-Yang Shen, Wen-Harn Pan, Yoon-Ok Ahn, San-Lin You, Jin-Hu Fan, Keun-Young Yoo, Habibul Ashan, Kee Seng Chia, Paolo Boffetta, Manami Inoue, Daehee Kang, John D. Potter, Wei Zheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 44% |
| Scientists | 8 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 217 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 107 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 116 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,141,420
of 24,787,209 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#4,475
of 8,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,071
of 356,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#121
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,787,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 130.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.