↓ Skip to main content

Impella use in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: Analysis of 10 years registry data

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impella use in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: Analysis of 10 years registry data
Published in
Resuscitation, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cedric Davidsen, Erik J S Packer, Kjetil H Løland, Svein Rotevatn, Else L Nygreen, Erlend Eriksen, Anja Øksnes, Jon Herstad, Rune Haaverstad, Øyvind Bleie, Vegard Tuseth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Unspecified 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,692,145
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#2,357
of 5,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,685
of 364,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#62
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.