You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How host genetics dictates successful viral zoonosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Biology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cody J. Warren, Sara L. Sawyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 18% |
| France | 11 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 60 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 89 | 67% |
| Scientists | 40 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 23% |
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 457. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#61,015
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#143
of 9,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,166
of 365,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#3
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.