| Title |
COMPARISON OF THE SAFETY OF CELECOXIB, IBUPROFEN, AND NAPROXEN IN PATIENTS WITHOUT ESTABLISHED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0735-1097(19)30637-0 |
| Authors |
Grant W. Reed, Haris Riaz, Quiqing Wang, Kathy Wolski, Lisa Wisniewski, Venu Menon, A. Lincoff, Steven Nissen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 8 | 18% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 14% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 9% |
| Peru | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,307,446
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#3,115
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,713
of 367,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#117
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.