You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immediate and Long-Term Efficacy of Executive Functions Cognitive Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Bulletin, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1037/bul0000196 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lan Nguyen, Karen Murphy, Glenda Andrews |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 14% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 53% |
| Scientists | 20 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 74 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 73 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,352,157
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Bulletin
#511
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,900
of 363,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Bulletin
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.