↓ Skip to main content

ISO‐CADICA: Isotopic – continuous, automated dissolved inorganic carbon analyser

Overview of attention for article published in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ISO‐CADICA: Isotopic – continuous, automated dissolved inorganic carbon analyser
Published in
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/rcm.6143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian M. Bass, Michael I. Bird, Niels C. Munksgaard, Christopher M. Wurster

Abstract

Quantifying the processes that control dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) dynamics in aquatic systems is essential for progress in ecosystem carbon budgeting. The development of a methodology that allows high-resolution temporal data collection over prolonged periods is essential and is described in this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Germany 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 61 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 9 13%
Professor 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 32%
Environmental Science 18 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2012.
All research outputs
#21,933,402
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#4,187
of 4,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,636
of 256,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#25
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,889 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.