You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural history of neuromodulation devices and therapies: a patient-centered survival analysis.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurosurgery, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3171/2019.2.jns182450 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zoe E Teton, Daniel Blatt, Amr AlBakry, James Obayashi, Gulsah Ozturk, Vural Hamzaoglu, Philippe Magown, Nathan R Selden, Kim J Burchiel, Ahmed M Raslan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 46% |
| Germany | 2 | 15% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 22% |
| Engineering | 6 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,446,799
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery
#1,473
of 6,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,478
of 365,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery
#43
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.