↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a combination of genistein, polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamins D3 and K1 on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Effect of a combination of genistein, polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamins D3 and K1 on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot study
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00394-012-0304-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Lappe, Iris Kunz, Igor Bendik, Kevin Prudence, Peter Weber, Robert Recker, Robert P. Heaney

Abstract

Many postmenopausal women desire non-pharmaceutical alternatives to hormone therapy for protection against osteoporosis. Soybean isoflavones, especially genistein, are being studied for this purpose. This study examined the effects of synthetic genistein in combination with other potential bone-protective dietary molecules on bone mineral density (BMD) in early postmenopausal women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 23%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Researcher 10 6%
Lecturer 8 5%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 47 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,683,329
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#983
of 2,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,717
of 247,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.