You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sweet cognition: The differential effects of glucose consumption on attentional food bias in individuals of lean and obese status
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physiology & Behavior, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.04.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley E Mason, Kinnari Jhaveri, Samantha Schleicher, Carlos Almeida, Alison Hartman, Angela Wackerly, Diana Alba, Suneil K Koliwad, Elissa S Epel, Kirstin Aschbacher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Greece | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Physiology & Behavior
#1,458
of 5,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,577
of 367,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiology & Behavior
#26
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.