You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Underestimated disease prevalence and severe phenotypes in patients with biallelic variants: A cohort study of primary familial brain calcification from China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.04.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Si Chen, Zhidong Cen, Feng Fu, You Chen, Xinhui Chen, Dehao Yang, Haotian Wang, Hongwei Wu, Xiaosheng Zheng, Fei Xie, Zhiyuan Ouyang, Weiguo Tang, Shuhong Zhang, Lili Yin, Yunqian Zhang, Peiying Meng, Xuzhen Zhu, Hongwei Zhang, Feifei Jiang, Kaiyu Zhang, Juping He, Danhong Zhang, Hanqiao Ming, Daqiao Song, Zhiping Zhou, Yong Luo, Qun Gu, Yongkun Su, Xinxiao Wu, Haiyan Tang, Chenglong Wu, Weiqing Chen, Jing-Yu Liu, Wei Luo, the Chinese PFBC Study Group, Xuerong Huang, Shaowei Fu, Wenhai Chen, Yanbin Huang, Likang Lan, Xiaofen Zhu, Zhijun Xu, Huayun Huang, Lifeng Zhou, Zilong Chen, Minfang Lou, Binglan Wang, Yi Tan, Manlian Zhu, Weijun Hong, Feng Wang, Gonghua Pan, Aimin Shao, Weiying Li, Haijun Li, Na Zhao, Haoyu Hu, Yaxi Zhang, Mengjia Lian, Jieying Li, Xueli Cai, Zixian Luo, Yan Zhou, Xiaoyi Lu, Li Ma, Enkui Xia, Xiaoluo Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#17,245,787
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
#2,092
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,888
of 366,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
#52
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.