| Title |
What Was Brewing in the Natufian? An Archaeological Assessment of Brewing Technology in the Epipaleolithic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-011-9127-y |
| Authors |
Brian Hayden, Neil Canuel, Jennifer Shanse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 28% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 83% |
| Scientists | 6 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 173 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 39 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 278. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#129,989
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#4
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#537
of 254,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them