↓ Skip to main content

Methods for the quantification of GHG emissions at the landscape level for developing countries in smallholder contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods for the quantification of GHG emissions at the landscape level for developing countries in smallholder contexts
Published in
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), February 2013
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015019
Authors

Eleanor Milne, Henry Neufeldt, Todd Rosenstock, Mike Smalligan, Carlos Eduardo Cerri, Daniella Malin, Mark Easter, Martial Bernoux, Stephen Ogle, Felipe Casarim, Timothy Pearson, David Neil Bird, Evelyn Steglich, Madelene Ostwald, Karolien Denef, Keith Paustian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Kenya 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 201 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 9 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 70 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 25%
Engineering 13 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 48 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#4,471
of 6,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,440
of 204,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#70
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.